Posted by Joe Panettieri
I’ve spent the last few weeks immersed in Web 2.0 technologies, social networks, RSS feeds … and the list goes on. We continue to build out our digital businesses. But during three key moments today, I rediscovered my love for magazines. First, I thumbed through a custom magazine we recently produced CompTIA, which traced the organization’s 25 years of service to the IT industry. Then the latest edition of TechIQ, our magazine for the IT channel, hit my desk (it’s a great read but I won’t brag too much). And finally, I stumbled upon the latest edition of Money magazine. Yes, Money magazine. I hate to admit it, but I still love that magazine’s ability to tell me what I already know about my pathetic saving and spending habits. Read the rest of this entry »




Who Cares About Portfolio?
20 07 2007Posted by Al Perlman
Another interesting thing going on in the magazine world is the inordinate amount of attention being paid to Portfolio, the new business magazine from Conde Nast. It’s the Paris Hilton of the publishing world, a well-financed, highly visible celebrity that hasn’t done much yet other than call attention to itself. Perhaps it’s because I’m in the media business and because I’m in New York that I see so much stuff about Portfolio, but, really, does anyone outside of those two circles really care? Do I think Portfolio has any chance of success? Nope. It’s way too print-oriented, it’s expensive to produce and, most importantly, it doesn’t serve an unfulfilled need for a growing or underserved community. I learned long ago that publishing is about the audience-delivery business, and Portfolio will have a tough time trying to establish a need or desire for its targeted audience to read it on a regular basis, especially with so many people turning away from magazines in general.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Magazines, Media comments, Publishing