Posted by Al Perlman
Magazines, as a medium, are in trouble. There’s a fun blog called magazine death pool magazinedeathpool.com that predicts which magazines are next likely to disappear next. Business 2.0 is currently a top choice, quite appropriately. In the tech space, the need for all of the myriad magazines that used to exist is gone, obviated by the ubiquity of information on the Web. But, in some markets, magazines remain a viable medium, primarily because they either lend themselves to newsstand sales—such as the celebrity magazines—or because print is still the best way for advertisers to show off their products. Here’s a case in point… Read the rest of this entry »



Who Cares About Portfolio?
20 07 2007Posted by Al Perlman
Another interesting thing going on in the magazine world is the inordinate amount of attention being paid to Portfolio, the new business magazine from Conde Nast. It’s the Paris Hilton of the publishing world, a well-financed, highly visible celebrity that hasn’t done much yet other than call attention to itself. Perhaps it’s because I’m in the media business and because I’m in New York that I see so much stuff about Portfolio, but, really, does anyone outside of those two circles really care? Do I think Portfolio has any chance of success? Nope. It’s way too print-oriented, it’s expensive to produce and, most importantly, it doesn’t serve an unfulfilled need for a growing or underserved community. I learned long ago that publishing is about the audience-delivery business, and Portfolio will have a tough time trying to establish a need or desire for its targeted audience to read it on a regular basis, especially with so many people turning away from magazines in general.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Magazines, Media comments, Publishing